Tell your story. Help change the law.

Has your organization faced a website-related demand letter or lawsuit? Businesses of every size, hospitals, nonprofits, and other organizations can share their experience or ask about joining the Coalition to Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits.

Contact the coalition

We’ll ask your permission before publishing your name, organization, or story.

California reform · October 13, 2026

SB 690 is signed. Broader website litigation remains.

Newsom signed the targeted CIPA reform on September 30. Effective January 1, 2027, it limits private website and app pen-register claims while leaving other CIPA claims available.

What changed—and what did not →

Why are website tools drawing wiretapping claims?

Many websites exchange information with outside providers. Some claims argue that a provider received that information without the consent required by wiretapping or related surveillance laws. The legal analysis depends on the data, the recipient, the technology and the claim.

For businesses, responding to a disputed claim can require legal and technical work before its merits are decided. The policy question is how to provide clear rules for digital commerce while preserving meaningful protection against misuse of personal information.

Understand the issue

The businesses behind the websites

Owners describe the decisions and costs that followed a claim.

Folsom Lake Heating & Air

The owner described a booking-service-related suit and a settlement whose amount and payer were not disclosed.

Elk Grove Plumbing

The owner described a settlement offer and defense estimate, then a decision to defend; those figures were not reported payments.

Read the business accounts

Explore the district map

Explore documented defendant locations by state and congressional district. Each published location should be traceable to a business-location source and a case record.

Published location data: September 27, 2026. Coverage is incomplete; locations are not counts of lawsuits filed in a district.

Map of all 50 U.S. states, including Alaska and Hawaii
Documented defendant locations · 119th Congress.

Which firms file the most cases?

Explore the plaintiffs’ firms most frequently recorded in our litigation database.

See the top 20 firms and their cases
  1. Pacific Trial Attorneys1,199 dockets
  2. Tauler Smith LLP769 dockets
  3. Salpeter Gitkin LLP469 dockets

All tracked litigation, including unclassified cases. Filing dates through 2026-05-02; snapshot 2026-09-28. How we count.

What the HAIL Act would change

The HAIL Act would establish a commercial-purpose exemption under specified federal and state surveillance laws. The scope of that exemption, its effect on existing proceedings and the remedies that would remain available are central to evaluating the proposal.

Introduced, not enacted

Representative Russ Fulcher introduced H.R. 10263 on September 3, 2026; it was referred to the House Judiciary Committee.

Official record checked 2026-09-27. Official status.

Follow the evidence.

Read court records, legislative text, business reporting and perspectives on reform. Source labels distinguish official records, reported experiences and advocacy.

Browse the source library

The coalition

This coalition supports the HAIL Act and a clear framework for responsible digital commerce. Learn who is involved and read the coalition’s published positions.

Filing patterns by law firm · Policy commentary

Share the briefing